%% This BibTeX bibliography file was created by Emma Pendl-Robinsion with the assistance of the Harvard Library HOLLIS system to find referances' BIBTEX.


%% Saved with string encoding Unicode (UTF-8) 


@book{AgrestiAlan2018Smft,
  abstract = {Statistical methods applied to social sciences, made accessible to all through an emphasis on concepts Statistical Methods for the Social Sciences introduces statistical methods to students majoring in social science disciplines. With an emphasis on concepts and applications, this book assumes you have no previous knowledge of statistics and only a minimal mathematical background. It contains sufficient material for a two-semester course. The 5th Edition gives you examples and exercises with a variety of “real data.” It includes more illustrations of statistical software for computations and takes advantage of the outstanding applets to explain key concepts, such as sampling distributions and conducting basic data analyses. It continues to downplay mathematics–often a stumbling block for students–while avoiding reliance on an overly simplistic recipe-based approach to statistics.--},
  publisher = {Pearson},
  isbn = {9780134507101},
  year = {2018},
  title = {Statistical methods for the social sciences},
  edition = {Fifth edition.},
  language = {eng},
  address = {Boston},
  author = {Agresti, Alan},
  keywords = {Statistics},
  lccn = {2016016613},
  }

@book{DePamphilisDonald2009MAaO,
  abstract = {The best teaching text and online package based on real-world cases for finance courses on mergers, acquisitions and other restructuring activities.},
  publisher = {Elsevier Science \& Technology},
  booktitle = {Mergers, Acquisitions, and Other Restructuring Activities},
  isbn = {9780123748782},
  year = {2009},
  title = {Mergers, Acquisitions, and Other Restructuring Activities: An Integrated Approach to Process, Tools, Cases, and Solutions},
  language = {eng},
  address = {San Diego},
  author = {DePamphilis, Donald and Depamphilis, Donald},
  keywords = {United States ; Organizational change ; Management ; Corporate reorganizations - United States - Management ; Consolidation and merger of corporations ; Corporate reorganizations},
  }

@article{BansakK2016Heha,
  issn = {1095-9203},
  abstract = {What types of asylum seekers are Europeans willing to accept? We conducted a conjoint experiment asking 18,000 eligible voters in 15 European countries to evaluate 180,000 profiles of asylum seekers that randomly varied on nine attributes. Asylum seekers who have higher employability, have more consistent asylum testimonies and severe vulnerabilities, and are Christian rather than Muslim received the greatest public support. These results suggest that public preferences over asylum seekers are shaped by sociotropic evaluations of their potential economic contributions, humanitarian concerns about the deservingness of their claims, and anti-Muslim bias. These preferences are similar across respondents of different ages, education levels, incomes, and political ideologies, as well as across the surveyed countries. This public consensus on what types of asylum seekers to accept has important implications for theory and policy.},
  journal = {Science (American Association for the Advancement of Science)},
  pages = {217--222},
  volume = {354},
  publisher = {American Association for the Advancement of Science (AAAS)},
  number = {6309},
  year = {2016},
  title = {How economic, humanitarian, and religious concerns shape European attitudes toward asylum seekers},
  copyright = {Copyright © 2016, American Association for the Advancement of Science.},
  language = {eng},
  address = {United States},
  author = {Bansak, K and Hainmueller, J and Hangartner, D},
  keywords = {Großbritannien ; Norwegen ; Ungarn ; Migration ; Arbeitsloser ; Wirtschaftslage ; Polen ; Griechenland ; Deutschland ; Frankreich ; Niederlande ; Motivation ; Asylbewerber ; Spanien ; Religion ; Österreich ; Internationaler Vergleich ; Dänemark ; Fremdsprachenkenntnisse ; Schweiz ; Tschechische Republik ; Erwerbstätiger ; Qualifikationsniveau ; Herkunftsland ; Asylpolitik ; Ausländer ; Schweden ; Flüchtling ; Einstellung (Psy) ; Italien ; Islam ; Public Opinion ; Attitude ; Employment ; Europe ; Humans ; Surveys and Questionnaires ; Altruism ; Christianity ; Refugees ; Emigration and Immigration ; Religious aspects ; Index Medicus},
  }

@book{MichaelJ.Crawley2015Saiu,
  abstract = {"...I know of no better book of its kind..." (Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, Vol 169 (1), January 2006) A revised and updated edition of this bestselling introductory textbook to statistical analysis using the leading free software package R This new edition of a bestselling title offers a concise introduction to a broad array of statistical methods, at a level that is elementary enough to appeal to a wide range of disciplines. Step-by-step instructions help the non-statistician to fully understand the methodology. The book covers the full range of statistical techniques likely to be needed to analyse the data from research projects, including elementary material like t--tests and chi--squared tests, intermediate methods like regression and analysis of variance, and more advanced techniques like generalized linear modelling. Includes numerous worked examples and exercises within each chapter.},
  publisher = {Wiley},
  booktitle = {<h>Statistics</h>},
  isbn = {9781118941096},
  year = {2015},
  title = {Statistics: an introduction using R},
  edition = {2nd ed},
  language = {eng},
  address = {New York},
  author = {Michael J. Crawley},
  keywords = {Mathematical statistics ; Textbooks ; R (Computer program language)},
  }

@article{DennisonJames2018ARTT,
  issn = {1467-923X},
  abstract = {In this article, we consider the causes of the increase in voting for anti‐immigration parties in western Europe in the past decade. We first note that one of the most commonly assumed reasons for this increase is an associated increase in anti‐immigration sentiment, which we show is likely to be false. We also outline the major theoretical explanations, which we argue are likely to be incomplete. We then introduce our proposed explanation: these parties have benefitted from a sharp increase in the salience of immigration amongst some voters. We show that there are strong correlations over time between the salience of immigration and the polling of such parties in most western European countries. We argue that aspects of immigration in the last decade have activated pre‐existing opposition to immigration amongst a shrinking segment of the populations of western European states.},
  journal = {The Political quarterly (London. 1930)},
  pages = {107--116},
  volume = {90},
  publisher = {Wiley},
  number = {1},
  year = {2018},
  title = {A Rising Tide? The Salience of Immigration and the Rise of Anti‐Immigration Political Parties in Western Europe},
  copyright = {The Authors 2018. The Political Quarterly © The Political Quarterly Publishing Co. Ltd. 2018 Published by John Wiley \& Sons Ltd},
  language = {eng},
  address = {London},
  author = {Dennison, James and Geddes, Andrew},
  keywords = {issue salience ; immigration ; populism ; radical right ; Populism ; Emigration and immigration ; Political parties ; Immigration ; Voters ; Voting},
  }
  
@article{2018SMft,
  issn = {2372-3424},
  volume = {2018},
  publisher = {Ringgold, Inc},
  number = {22},
  year = {2018},
  title = {Statistical Methods for the Social \& Behavioural Sciences: A Model-Based Approach},
  copyright = {COPYRIGHT 2018 Ringgold, Inc.},
  language = {eng},
  address = {Beaverton},
  keywords = {Books ; Book reviews},
  }


@article{FordRobert2020TCCP,
  issn = {1094-2939},
  abstract = {How are the contours of Western European politics shifting? To what extent do these shifts reflect changes in the underlying social and economic structure of European polities? In this article, we reflect on insights from the classic literature on how cleavages structure party systems and consider how the emergence and persistence of new parties and new ideological conflicts are leading to both shifts of dividing lines of party competition and the fragmentation of party systems. While increasing attention has been given to the so-called second dimension of European electoral politics, we highlight the relatively limited focus on structural changes that are helping to drive this transformation. We identify some socio-demographic developments that are potentially generating new cleavages in Western European democracies: the expansion of higher education; mass migration and the growing ethnic diversity of electorates; the aging of societies and sharpening of generational divides; and increased geographical segregation of populations between prospering, globalized major cities and declining hinterlands.},
  journal = {Annual review of political science},
  pages = {295--314},
  volume = {23},
  publisher = {Annual Reviews},
  number = {1},
  year = {2020},
  title = {The Changing Cleavage Politics of Western Europe},
  copyright = {Copyright Annual Reviews, Inc. 2020},
  language = {eng},
  address = {Palo Alto},
  author = {Ford, Robert and Jennings, Will},
  keywords = {political sociology ; Western European politics ; elections ; cleavage politics ; party competition ; Transformation ; Segmentation ; Segregation ; Migration ; Multiculturalism \& pluralism ; Elections ; Higher education ; Contours ; Aging ; Cleavage ; Politics ; Political parties ; Economic structure ; Sociodemographics},
  }

@book{GelmanAndrew2006DAUR,
  series = {Analytical methods for social research},
  abstract = {This book, first published in 2007, is for the applied researcher performing data analysis using linear and nonlinear regression and multilevel models.},
  publisher = {Cambridge University Press},
  booktitle = {<h>Data</h> <h>Analysis</h> <h>Using</h> <h>Regression</h> and <h>Multilevel</h>/<h>Hierarchical</h> <h>Models</h>},
  isbn = {0521867061},
  year = {2006},
  title = {Data Analysis Using Regression and Multilevel/Hierarchical Models},
  language = {eng},
  address = {Cambridge},
  author = {Gelman, Andrew and Hill, Jennifer and Alvarez, R. Michael and Beck, Nathaniel L and Wu, Lawrence L},
  keywords = {Regression analysis ; Multilevel models (Statistics)},
  }

@article{GrandeEdgar2018PiiW,
  issn = {1350-1763},
  abstract = {Immigration has become a hot topic in West European politics. The factors responsible for the intensification of political conflict on this issue are a matter of considerable controversy. This holds in particular for the role of socio-economic factors and of radical right populist parties. This article explores the politicization of immigration issues and its driving forces in the electoral arena. It is based on a comparative study using both media and manifesto data covering six West European countries (Austria, France, Germany, Netherlands, Switzerland, and the UK) for a period from the early 1990s until 2017. We find no association between socio-economic factors and levels of politicization. Political conflict over immigration follows a political logic and must be attributed to parties and party competition rather than to 'objective pressures.' More specifically, we provide evidence that the issue entrepreneurship of radical right populist parties plays a crucial role in explaining variation in the politicization of immigration.},
  journal = {Journal of European public policy},
  pages = {1--20},
  volume = {26},
  publisher = {Informa UK Limited},
  number = {10},
  year = {2018},
  title = {Politicizing immigration in Western Europe},
  copyright = {2018 The Author(s). Published by Informa UK Limited, trading as Taylor \& Francis Group 2018},
  language = {eng},
  address = {London},
  author = {Grande, Edgar and Schwarzbözl, Tobias and Fatke, Matthias},
  keywords = {immigration ; political parties ; politicization ; Europe ; party manifestos ; Competition ; Political conflict ; Politicization ; Populism ; Economic aspects ; Economic factors ; Elections ; Conflict ; Socioeconomic factors ; Entrepreneurship ; Immigration ; Radicalism ; Comparative studies ; Politics ; Mass media ; Political parties},
  }
  
@article{Green-PedersenChristoffer2017AhtI,
  issn = {1354-0688},
  abstract = {The party politics of immigration is one of the fastest growing bodies of research within the study of West European politics. Within this literature, an underlying assumption is that immigration has become one of the most salient issues. However, this is rarely documented, let alone explained. Drawing on a new coding of party manifestos in seven West European countries, this article shows that party attention to immigration has grown in all countries since 1980 but only in Denmark has the issue become one of the most salient issues of party politics. We find that the general increase in attention reflects the rising number of immigrants and rise of radical right-wing parties. In terms of the issue becoming a top issue of party politics, a comparative analysis of the politicization of immigration in Denmark and the Netherlands shows that the interest of mainstream right-wing parties and coalition dynamics are the crucial factors.},
  journal = {Party politics},
  pages = {424--434},
  volume = {25},
  publisher = {SAGE Publications},
  number = {3},
  year = {2017},
  title = {A hot topic? Immigration on the agenda in Western Europe},
  copyright = {info:eu-repo/semantics/closedAccess},
  language = {eng},
  address = {London, England},
  author = {Green-Pedersen, Christoffer and Otjes, Simon},
  keywords = {immigration ; MAINSTREAM ; POLICY ; issue competition ; EXTREME-RIGHT ; coalition dynamics ; politicization ; RADICAL RIGHT PARTIES ; Western Europe ; DENMARK ; Coding ; Politicization ; Attention ; Immigration ; Radicalism ; Politics ; Comparative analysis ; Immigrants ; Political parties ; Right wing politics},
  }

@article{HainmuellerJens2014PATI,
  issn = {1545-1577},
  abstract = {Immigrant populations in many developed democracies have grown rapidly, and so too has an extensive literature on natives' attitudes toward immigration. This research has developed from two theoretical foundations, one grounded in political economy, the other in political psychology. These two literatures have developed largely in isolation from one another, yet the conclusions that emerge from each are strikingly similar. Consistently, immigration attitudes show little evidence of being strongly correlated with personal economic circumstances. Instead, research finds that immigration attitudes are shaped by sociotropic concerns about its cultural impacts-and to a lesser extent its economic impacts-on the nation as a whole. This pattern of results has held up as scholars have increasingly turned to experimental tests, and it holds for the United States, Canada, and Western Europe. Still, more work is needed to strengthen the causal identification of sociotropic concerns and to isolate precisely how, when, and why they matter for attitude formation.},
  journal = {Annual review of political science},
  pages = {225--249},
  volume = {17},
  publisher = {Annual Reviews},
  number = {1},
  isbn = {0824333179},
  year = {2014},
  title = {Public Attitudes Toward Immigration},
  copyright = {COPYRIGHT 2014 Annual Reviews, Inc.},
  language = {eng},
  author = {Hainmueller, Jens and Hopkins, Daniel J},
  keywords = {Political science research ; Economic aspects ; Emigration and immigration ; Public opinion ; Social aspects},
  }

@article{HainmuellerJens2015THAI,
  issn = {0092-5853},
  abstract = {Many studies have examined Americans' immigration attitudes. Yet prior research frequently confounds multiple questions, including which immigrants to admit and how many to admit. To isolate attitudes on the former question, we use a conjoint experiment that simultaneously tests the influence of nine immigrant attributes in generating support for admission. Drawing on a two-wave, population-based survey, we demonstrate that Americans view educated immigrants in high-status jobs favorably, whereas they view those who lack plans to work, entered without authorization, are Iraqi, or do not speak English unfavorably. Strikingly, Americans' preferences vary little with their own education, partisanship, labor market position, ethnocentrism, or other attributes. Beneath partisan divisions over immigration lies a broad consensus about who should be admitted to the country. The results are consistent with norms-based and sociotropic explanations of immigration attitudes. This consensus points to limits in both theories emphasizing economic and cultural threats, and sheds new light on an ongoing policy debate.},
  journal = {American journal of political science},
  pages = {529--548},
  volume = {59},
  publisher = {Wiley},
  number = {3},
  year = {2015},
  title = {The Hidden American Immigration Consensus: A Conjoint Analysis of Attitudes toward Immigrants},
  copyright = {2015, Midwest Political Science Association},
  language = {eng},
  address = {Oxford},
  author = {Hainmueller, Jens and Hopkins, Daniel J},
  keywords = {Financial advisers ; Political attitudes ; Gender construction ; Employment ; Immigration policy ; Job experience ; Ethnocentrism ; Employment interviews ; College admission ; Bachelors degrees ; Emigration and immigration ; Labor market ; Public opinion ; Immigrants ; Analysis ; Attitudes ; Political science ; Conjoint analysis ; Market positioning},
  }

@article{HanmerMichaelJ2013BtCC,
  issn = {0092-5853},
  abstract = {Models designed for limited dependent variables are increasingly common in political science. Researchers estimating such models often give little attention to the coefficient estimates and instead focus on marginal effects, predicted probabilities, predicted counts, etc. Since the models are nonlinear, the estimated effects are sensitive to how one generates the predictions. The most common approach involves estimating the effect for the "average case." But this approach creates a weaker connection between the results and the larger goals of the research enterprise and is thus less preferable than the observed-value approach. That is, rather than seeking to understand the effect for the average case, the goal is to obtain an estimate of the average effect in the population. In addition to the theoretical argument in favor of the observed-value approach, we illustrate via an empirical example and Monte Carlo simulations that the two approaches can produce substantively different results.},
  journal = {American journal of political science},
  pages = {263--277},
  volume = {57},
  publisher = {Wiley},
  number = {1},
  year = {2013},
  title = {Behind the Curve: Clarifying the Best Approach to Calculating Predicted Probabilities and Marginal Effects from Limited Dependent Variable Models},
  copyright = {2013 Midwest Political Science Association},
  language = {eng},
  address = {Malden, USA},
  author = {Hanmer, Michael J and Ozan Kalkan, Kerem},
  keywords = {AJPS WORKSHOP ; Economic analysis ; Observational research ; Monte Carlo methods ; Economic value ; Voting ; Mathematical independent variables ; Academic degrees ; Arithmetic mean ; Coefficients ; Modeling ; Monte Carlo method ; Models ; College teachers ; Analysis ; Variables ; Probability ; Political science ; Simulation},
  }

@article{HattonTimothyJPooi,
  issn = {0176-2680},
  abstract = {Studies of public opinion on immigration have focused on the responses to survey questions about whether the individual would prefer more or less immigration (preference) but not on his or her assessment of its importance as a policy issue (salience). Analysis of data from the European Social Survey and Eurobarometer indicates that preference and salience are associated with different individual-level characteristics. At the national level they move differently over time and in response to different macro-level variables. Both dimensions of opinion must be taken into account as influences on the formation of immigration policy.
  •Studies of public opinion on immigration focus on preference and neglect salience.•Preference is about more/less immigration; salience is about its political importance.•Preference and salience are differently associated with individual characteristics.•Preference and salience move differently in response to macro-level variables.•Immigration policy is likely influenced by both preference and salience combined.},
  journal = {European Journal of Political Economy},
  publisher = {Elsevier B.V},
  title = {Public opinion on immigration in Europe: Preference and salience},
  copyright = {2020 Elsevier B.V.},
  language = {eng},
  author = {Hatton, Timothy J},
  keywords = {Attitudes to immigration ; Salience ; Public opinion},
  }
  
@book{ImaiKosuke2017Qss,
  abstract = {Quantitative analysis is an increasingly essential skill for social science research, yet students in the social sciences and related areas typically receive little training in it--or if they do, they usually end up in statistics classes that offer few insights into their field. This textbook is a practical introduction to data analysis and statistics written especially for undergraduates and beginning graduate students in the social sciences and allied fields, such as economics, sociology, public policy, and data science. Quantitative Social Science engages directly with empirical analysis, showing students how to analyze data using the R programming language and to interpret the results--it encourages hands-on learning, not paper-and-pencil statistics. More than forty data sets taken directly from leading quantitative social science research illustrate how data analysis can be used to answer important questions about society and human behavior. Proven in the classroom, this one-of-a-kind textbook features numerous additional data analysis exercises and interactive R programming exercises, and also comes with supplementary teaching materials for instructors. --},
  publisher = {Princeton University Press},
  isbn = {9780691175461},
  year = {2017},
  title = {Quantitative social science : an introduction},
  language = {eng},
  address = {Princeton},
  author = {Imai, Kosuke},
  keywords = {Social sciences -- Methodology},
  lccn = {2016962298},
  }
  
@article{JeannetAnne-MarieWAaR,
  issn = {1556-5068},
  journal = {SSRN Electronic Journal},
  title = {What Asylum and Refugee Policies Do Europeans Want? Evidence From a Cross-National Conjoint Experiment},
  language = {eng},
  author = {Jeannet, Anne-Marie and Ademmer, Esther and Ruhs, Martin and Stöhr, Tobias},
  }

@article{KustovAlexanderTSoI,
  issn = {1556-5068},
  journal = {SSRN Electronic Journal},
  title = {The Stability of Immigration Attitudes: Evidence and Implications},
  language = {eng},
  author = {Kustov, Alexander and Laaker, Dillon and Reller, Cassidy},
  }

@book{McElreathRichard2016SRAB,
  series = {Chapman \& Hall/CRC Texts in Statistical Science},
  abstract = {Statistical Rethinking: A Bayesian Course with Examples in R and Stan builds readers’ knowledge of and confidence in statistical modeling. Reflecting the need for even minor programming in today’s model-based statistics, the book pushes readers to perform step-by-step calculations that are usually automated. This unique computational approach ensures that readers understand enough of the details to make reasonable choices and interpretations in their own modeling work.
  The text presents generalized linear multilevel models from a Bayesian perspective, relying on a simple logical interpretation of Bayesian probability and maximum entropy. It covers from the basics of regression to multilevel models. The author also discusses measurement error, missing data, and Gaussian process models for spatial and network autocorrelation.
  By using complete R code examples throughout, this book provides a practical foundation for performing statistical inference. Designed for both PhD students and seasoned professionals in the natural and social sciences, it prepares them for more advanced or specialized statistical modeling.
  Web ResourceThe book is accompanied by an R package (rethinking) that is available on the author’s website and GitHub. The two core functions (map and map2stan) of this package allow a variety of statistical models to be constructed from standard model formulas.},
  volume = {122},
  publisher = {CRC Press},
  booktitle = {<h>Statistical</h> <h>Rethinking</h>},
  isbn = {1482253445},
  year = {2016},
  title = {Statistical Rethinking: A Bayesian Course with Examples in R and Stan},
  edition = {1},
  copyright = {2016 by Taylor \& Francis Group, LLC},
  language = {eng},
  address = {Boca Raton},
  author = {McElreath, Richard},
  keywords = {Statistics for Business ; Psychological Methods \& Statistics ; Statistical Theory \& Methods ; Finance \& Economics ; Bayesian statistical decision theory ; R (Computer program language)},
  }

@article{StockemerDaniel2018IPot,
  issn = {0017-257X},
  abstract = {In this article, we summarize the individual demand-level factors explaining the radical right-wing vote in European countries. To do so, we first review 46 quantitative peer-reviewed articles featuring the individual vote choice in favour of a radical right-wing party as the dependent variable. To identify relevant articles, we use Kai Arzheimer’s bibliography on the radical right and employ the following inclusion criterion: the articles must be written in English, they must use the individual vote for a radical right-wing party as the dependent variable, they must use a quantitative methodology and they must include some type of regression analysis. Using this strategy, we conduct a meta-analysis of 329 relevant models and find that over 20 individual variables are tested. Because many variables such as attitudes towards immigration, employment, age, education and gender only show moderate success rates in attempting to explain an individual’s propensity to vote for the radical right, we complement the review of quantitative studies with an analysis of 14 qualitative publications. The review of these qualitative works shows that the processes through which somebody becomes a voter, supporter or activist of the radical right are often more complex than the commonly used surveys can portray them. Frequently, feelings of relative economic deprivation and dissatisfaction with the political regime trigger an awakening that makes individuals seek engagement. However, the processes behind this awakening are complex and can only be partially captured by quantitative studies.},
  journal = {Government and opposition (London)},
  pages = {569--593},
  volume = {53},
  publisher = {Cambridge University Press},
  number = {3},
  year = {2018},
  title = {Individual Predictors of the Radical Right-Wing Vote in Europe: A Meta-Analysis of Articles in Peer-Reviewed Journals (1995–2016)},
  copyright = {Copyright © The Author(s). Published by Government and Opposition Limited and Cambridge University Press 2018},
  language = {eng},
  address = {Cambridge, UK},
  author = {Stockemer, Daniel and Lentz, Tobias and Mayer, Danielle},
  keywords = {Review Article ; Radical groups ; Articles ; Populism ; Inclusive education ; Elections ; Voting ; Employment ; Bibliographic literature ; Radicalism ; Economic deprivation ; Relative deprivation ; Beneficiaries ; Political parties ; Right wing politics ; Quantitative analysis ; Qualitative research ; Deprivation ; Activism ; Publications ; Attitudes ; Regression analysis ; Activists ; Meta-analysis ; Studies ; Political activism ; Journals ; Immigration ; Discontent},
  }

@article{DanielStockemer2019TRCI,
  issn = {1747-7379},
  abstract = {Between 2015 and 2017, the European Union (EU) was confronted with a major crisis in its history, the so-called “European refugee crisis.” Since the multifaceted crisis has provoked many different responses, it is also likely to have influenced individuals’ assessments of immigrants and European integration. Using data from three waves of the European Social Survey (ESS) — the wave before the crisis in 2012, the wave at the beginning of the crisis in 2014, and the wave right after the (perceived) height of the crisis in 2016 — we test the degree to which the European refugee crisis increased Europeans’ anti-immigrant sentiment and Euroscepticism, as well as the influence of Europeans’ anti-immigrant attitudes on their level of Euroscepticism. As suggested by prior research, our results indicate that there is indeed a consistent and solid relationship between more critical attitudes toward immigrants and increased Euroscepticism. Surprisingly, however, we find that the crisis increased neither anti-immigrant sentiments nor critical attitudes toward the EU and did not reinforce the link between rejection of immigrants and rejection of the EU. These findings imply that even under a strong external shock, fundamental political attitudes remain constant.},
  journal = {The International migration review},
  pages = {019791831987992--912},
  volume = {54},
  publisher = {SAGE Publications},
  number = {3},
  year = {2019},
  title = {The “Refugee Crisis,” Immigration Attitudes, and Euroscepticism},
  copyright = {The Author(s) 2019},
  language = {eng},
  address = {Los Angeles, CA},
  author = {Daniel, Stockemer and Arne, Niemann and Doris, Unger and Johanna, Speyer},
  keywords = {Rejection ; Euroscepticism ; Aliens ; Political attitudes ; European cultural groups ; Accession ; Immigration ; Attitudes ; Refugees ; Crises ; Political development ; Immigrants},
  }

@article{ValentinoNicholasA2019EaCD,
  issn = {0007-1234},
  abstract = {Employing a comparative experimental design drawing on over 18,000 interviews across eleven countries on four continents, this article revisits the discussion about the economic and cultural drivers of attitudes towards immigrants in advanced democracies. Experiments manipulate the occupational status, skin tone and national origin of immigrants in short vignettes. The results are most consistent with a Sociotropic Economic Threat thesis: In all countries, higher-skilled immigrants are preferred to their lower-skilled counterparts at all levels of native socio-economic status (SES). There is little support for the Labor Market Competition hypothesis, since respondents are not more opposed to immigrants in their own SES stratum. While skin tone itself has little effect in any country, immigrants from Muslim-majority countries do elicit significantly lower levels of support, and racial animus remains a powerful force.},
  journal = {British journal of political science},
  pages = {1201--1226},
  volume = {49},
  publisher = {Cambridge University Press},
  number = {4},
  year = {2019},
  title = {Economic and Cultural Drivers of Immigrant Support Worldwide},
  copyright = {Cambridge University Press 2017},
  language = {eng},
  address = {Cambridge, UK},
  author = {Valentino, Nicholas A and Soroka, Stuart N and Iyengar, Shanto and Aalberg, Toril and Duch, Raymond and Fraile, Marta and Hahn, Kyu S and Hansen, Kasper M and Harell, Allison and Helbling, Marc and Jackman, Simon D and Kobayashi, Tetsuro},
  keywords = {Articles ; Competition ; Aliens ; Socioeconomic status ; Labor market ; Working class ; Immigration policy ; Respondents ; Attitudes ; Whites ; Islamic countries ; Economic status ; Occupational status ; Cultural differences ; Vignettes ; Experiments ; Immigrants ; Studies ; Elections ; Hypotheses ; Employment ; Socioeconomic factors ; Race ; Comparative studies ; Skin},
  }

@article{StantchevaStefanie2018IaR,
  series = {NBER Working Paper Series},
  abstract = {We design and conduct large-scale surveys and experiments in six countries to investigate how natives perceive immigrants and how these perceptions influence their preferences for redistribution. We find strikingly large misperceptions about the number and characteristics of immigrants: in all countries, respondents greatly overestimate the total number of immigrants, think immigrants are culturally and religiously more distant from them, and are economically weaker -- less educated, more unemployed, and more reliant on and favored by government transfers -- than is the case. Given the very negative baseline views that respondents have of immigrants, simply making them think about immigration before asking questions about redistribution, in a randomized manner, makes them support less redistribution, including actual donations to charities. Information about the true shares and origins of immigrants is ineffective, and mainly acts as a prime that makes people think about immigrants and reduces their support for redistribution. An anecdote about a "hard working'' immigrant is somewhat more effective, suggesting that when it comes to immigration, salience and narratives shape people's views more deeply than hard facts.},
  publisher = {National Bureau of Economic Research},
  year = {2018},
  title = {Immigration and Redistribution},
  language = {eng},
  author = {Stantcheva, Stefanie and Alesina, Alberto F and Miano, Armando},
  keywords = {Political Economy ; Public Economics ; Labor Studies},
  }

@article{GrigorieffAlexis2020DICA,
  issn = {0070-3370},
  journal = {Demography},
  pages = {1117--1143},
  volume = {57},
  number = {3},
  year = {2020},
  title = {Does Information Change Attitudes Toward Immigrants?},
  language = {eng},
  author = {Grigorieff, Alexis and Roth, Christopher and Ubfal, Diego},
  keywords = {Index Medicus},
  }

@book{GARYKING2010UPMT,
  abstract = {One of the hallmarks of the development of political science as a discipline has been the creation of new methodologies by scholars within the discipline--methodologies that are well-suited to the analysis of political data. Gary King has been a leader in the development of these new approaches to the analysis of political data. In his book,Unifying Political Methodology, King shows how the likelihood theory of inference offers a unified approach to statistical modeling for political research and thus enables us to better analyze the enormous amount of data political scientists have collected over the years. Newly reissued, this book is a landmark in the development of political methodology and continues to challenge scholars and spark controversy.
  "Gary King'sUnifying Political Methodologyis at once an introduction to the likelihood theory of statistical inference and an evangelist's call for us to change our ways of doing political methodology. One need not accept the altar call to benefit enormously from the book, but the intellectual debate over the call for reformation is likely to be the enduring contribution of the work."
  --Charles Franklin,American Political Science Review
  "King's book is one of the only existing books which deal with political methodology in a clear and consistent framework. The material in it is now and will continue to be essential reading for all serious students and researchers in political methodology." --R. Michael Alvarez, California Institute of Tech-nology
  Gary King is Professor of Government, Harvard University. One of the leading thinkers in political methodology, he is the author ofA Solution to the Ecological Inference Problem: Reconstructing Individual Behavior from Aggregate Dataand other books and articles.},
  publisher = {University of Michigan Press},
  booktitle = {<h>Unifying</h> <h>Political</h> <h>Methodology</h>},
  isbn = {0472085549},
  year = {2010},
  title = {Unifying Political Methodology: The Likelihood Theory of Statistical Inference},
  copyright = {1998 Gary King},
  language = {eng},
  author = {GARY KING},
  keywords = {Political science ; Methodology ; Probabilities ; Political statistics},
  }

@book{2019AtWM,
abstract = {Record Number: 2019 IIS 2910-S1.10514
Issuing Agency: Pew Research Center
Accession Number: 2910-S1.10514
Report on public views on immigrant national impact and cultural assimilation, and support for deportation of immigrants in country illegally, for 18 countries, spring 2018. Data are from Pew Global Attitudes Survey.
Includes survey response on:
a. Perceived immigrant positive or negative impact on country, and willingness to adopt customs and way of life.
b. Support for deporting immigrants in country illegally.
Data are shown by respondent age, income level, educational attainment, or political ideology. Includes summary comparisons to results of earlier surveys.
Public views on immigrant natl impact and cultural assimilation, and support for deportation of immigrants in country illegally, for 18 countries, spring 2018 survey},
booktitle = {<h>Around</h> <h>the World</h>, <h>More Say</h> <h>Immigrants</h> <h>Are a Strength</h> <h>Than a Burden</h>;2019 IIS 2910-S1.10514},
year = {2019},
title = {Around the World, More Say Immigrants Are a Strength Than a Burden;2019 IIS 2910-S1.10514},
language = {eng},
keywords = {Deportation ; Public opinion surveys ; Immigration and emigration ; Social life & customs},
organization = {Pew Research Center},
}









